tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-51549119187008713922024-03-12T21:45:22.691-07:00 SaveOurWaterWNCAn informational site about the legislative attempt to remove control of Asheville/Buncombe's water system from the City of Asheville, and to take that precedent to other communities.barryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18229976502728157264noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5154911918700871392.post-39602405642516929402012-02-15T19:45:00.000-08:002018-07-26T12:27:11.636-07:00<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0.19in; margin-top: 0.19in;">
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/6iiz7dkczt67mr7/timeline14.pdf?dl=0" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a> to see an updated summary of Rep. McGrady's statements and actions suggesting he is moving towards another attempt to seize or "regionalize" Asheville's water, and possibly Hendersonville's as well.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdoRGmODOas" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a> to see the video of the oral arguments in the case of City of Asheville v. State of North Carolina, before the NC Supreme Court, May 17th 2016. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdoRGmODOas&feature=youtu.be&t=2977" target="_blank"><b>Click here</b></a> to go straight to the moment where the attorney for the State of North Carolina incomprehensibly invoked the case of <i>Flint Michigan</i>, to support his argument <b>IN FAVOR OF</b> giving the State the ability to seize municipal water systems. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>The Asheville Water system debate lives on</b></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://ashevillecitizentimes.nc.newsmemory.com/publink.php?shareid=0c2a3019e" target="_blank">Asheville Citizen-Times Guest Commentary, Mar. 11, 2018.</a><b> </b></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<i><u><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">"Forced"??</span></b></u></i><span style="font-size: x-large;"> During his remarks to Asheville's City Council on Feb. 27th 2018, Rep. McGrady made this astounding comment:</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>Councilmember question</u>: “It seems to me that what I’m
hearing you say is that we’re past the time when anyone is looking to
force a transfer, or a takeover, or otherwise seize or remove control of
the City of Asheville over its water system?"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">
</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">
</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>Rep. Chuck McGrady</u>: “No, I have absolutely NO interest in going down that road… (pause...two...three) <i><b>...unless I’m forced.”</b></i></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">He went on to link <b><i>not</i> </b>getting satisfaction on Henderson County membership in MSD, as the sort of thing that might "force" him to go after Asheville's water again.<i><b> </b></i></span><br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/2P4fWmx3mxU?t=728" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">(full video including questions from Council members and public comments here.)</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b></b></u></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Minutes from a 1994 effort to study Asheville/Buncombe/Henderson/Hendersonville regional water/sewer, apparently led by the City of Asheville. <a href="http://www.hendersoncountync.org/agendas/940420m.pdf" target="_blank">starts on page 7</a></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b></b></u></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/mxpwr3hletgspgm/names.pdf?dl=0" target="_blank">Email contact info</a> for members of the <a href="https://ncleg.net/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=Non-Standing_6713" target="_blank">Committee to Study Rates and Transfers/Public Enterprises </a></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b><br /></b></u></span></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb. 12</b></u> <span style="font-size: large;">At the first meeting of Rep. McGrady's water/sewer </span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;">study committee, he <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/05kunznsppdne15/021218outside.mp3?dl=0" target="_blank">confirmed</a> that he will likely be legislating (or "backing into") the representation issue. As he has pointed out repeatedly, 40 % of the customers of the City of Asheville's water system live outside city limits. In his hometown of Hendersonville, over 70% are not city residents. He has previously stated </span></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"> (<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/jnuuuaayf8ou8ok/McGrady4weboutside.mp3?dl=0" target="_blank">Blue Ridge Public Radio, Dec. 20th</a>) </span></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;">that this 'lack of representation' is of "primary interest" to him going forward. The fact that he now chairs a committee that is likely to be drafting legislation "requiring" the regionalization of certain municipal water/sewer systems... coincidence?</span><u><b> </b></u></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Update</b></u><b> </b>Dec. 20th. <span style="font-size: large;">In a surprising move, Buncombe County's Metropolitan Sewerage District voted 10 - 1 <b><i>not</i></b> to accept Henderson County's petition to formally join MSD. This would have given Henderson Co. 3 seats on MSD's Board - a move strongly supported by Rep. Chuck McGrady. Some Board members expressed concern about Rep. McGrady's new study committee, and that it might signal a move to go after Asheville's water again. Rep. McGrady called this theory "crazy", despite the fact that his new committee is charged with looking at <i><b>exactly that</b></i>, and he's been talking about taking another look at "regionalization" since the day that Asheville prevailed in the NC Supreme Court. "There's more than one way to skin a cat" is how he put it. He has also stated that the only thing stopping him from moving forward with his "nuclear option" as he calls it, is if "the parties appear to be working well together". His statement after the MSD vote?</span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><i><b>"Frankly, from my perspective, it’s typical behavior, and
people wonder why we can’t seem to work together on a range of
issues: transportation, water, sewer.”</b></i></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Full audio of the 12/20 Board discussion and public comments <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/uu80m6ep93vn2jn/msdboardfull.mp3?dl=0" target="_blank">here</a>. SaveOurWaterWNC members Barry Summers and Beth Jezek comments <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/cfue4wwzg0aa4iy/barrybeth.mp3?dl=0" target="_blank">here</a>.<i><b> </b></i></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">“<i><b>There is more than one way to skin a cat."</b></i></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Henderson County Rep. Chuck McGrady <a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2016/12/21/asheville-keeps-control-water-system-courtrules/95702990/">said
that</a> on the day</span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;"> in 2016 that</span></span><span style="font-size: large;"> <span style="font-style: normal;">Asheville won
the NC Supreme Court case over control of their water system. His actions since then strongly suggest that he is following through on his threat to try, try again to gain
control over Asheville/Buncombe's infrastructure.</span></span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Just as it started six years ago, Rep. McGrady has recently created <a href="https://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=Non-Standing_6713" target="_blank">a study committee in Raleigh</a>, to look at various aspects of the provision of water and sewer services in North Carolina. McGrady's stated reasons for this action are a cause for concern. In an <a href="http://www.blueridgenow.com/news/20171024/mcgrady-speaker-moore-talk-budget-overriding-vetoes" target="_blank">October joint interview with NC Speaker Tim Moore</a>, Rep. McGrady stated what led him to ask for the study:</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-align: center;">
<i><span style="font-size: large;">"The big
issue we’ve been dealing with is water and sewer in terms of the
fight between Asheville and Hendersonville, which then turned into a
fight between Hendersonville and Henderson County."</span></i></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Ask around, scour the local news from over the past year. You'll discover one thing: <i><b>There is no fight between Asheville and Hendersonville.</b></i> It appears that Rep. McGrady simply made this up out of thin air, to justify creating another study committee. </span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;"></span><span style="font-style: normal;">And
like its predecessor, led by McGrady and fmr. Rep. Tim Moffitt, it is
about solving a problem that does not exist.</span></span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><a href="https://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/lrc/2017-2018%20Committees/11-9-2017%20Meeting%20and%20Authorizing%20Documents/LRC%20Letter%202017-2018.pdf" target="_blank">According to the authorizing documents</a>, one of the areas the committee will study is whether legislation requiring regionalization of public utilities is "necessary". Regionalization is another word for what was previously attempted - using State authority to force municipalities to give up control of their public assets. <a href="http://www.blueridgenow.com/news/20170412/bill-water-systems-would-need-approval-to-charge-different-rates" target="_blank">Rep. McGrady has referred to that as a "nuclear option"</a> over the past year, and he's stated that he has considered using it against both Asheville <i><b>and</b></i> the City of Hendersonville. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">During the previous debate, it was believed by many that if/when McGrady and his allies succeeded in the forced transfer of Asheville's water system to a regional authority, Hendersonville's assets would be absorbed next. Fmr. Sen. Tom Apodaca of Henderson County <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/mx1f8wstj8atwji/apodaca-4-25-13.mp3?dl=0" target="_blank">suggested as much</a> during the 2013 debate over that previous legislation, saying it would create a regional water/sewer authority that would serve Buncombe, Henderson, and even <i>Transylvania County</i> all the way to the south of Hendersonville. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">The biggest beneficiaries of such a "regionalization" would be Henderson County, which has no water or sewer treatment system of their own, and has long complained about both Asheville and Hendersonville's policies.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">There are two main differences between the study committee that's just been created</span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">, and <a href="https://ncleg.net/gascripts/DocumentSites/browseDocSite.asp?nID=179&sFolderName=\Meetings" target="_blank">the 2012 Moffitt/McGrady study committee</a></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">. First, it is a joint House/Senate committee with far more members from both houses. And second, instead of a limited four meeting/four month operating window, McGrady's new committee has almost two years to hold meetings and draft legislation. If Chuck McGrady isn't planning something really ambitious, he wants people to think he is. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Perhaps this is all part of an attempt by McGrady to pressure the City of Asheville into voluntarily ceding some concessions towards Henderson County. In any case, oh good lord, here we go again.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Dec. 21st 2016: ASHEVILLE WINS!!! </b></span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=1&pdf=35087" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Read the full NC Supreme Court ruling here.</span></a></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>No December 9th decision. The next possible date for a decision is Dec. 21st. </b></span></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>No September decision. The next possible date for a decision on the Asheville water case by the NC Supreme Court is December 9th.</b></span> </b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>No August decision. The next possible date for a decision on the Asheville water case by the NC Supreme Court is September 23rd.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><u>August 12, 2016</u> </b>Guest column by Katie Hicks and Barry Summers in the Asheville Citizen-Times:<b> <i>Well-governed drinking water systems more vital than ever </i></b>(<a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/story/opinion/contributors/2016/08/12/guest-columnists-governed-drinking-water-systems-vital-ever/88610038/?from=global&sessionKey=&autologin=" target="_blank">AC-T</a>, <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/op-ed2016(2).pdf" target="_blank">non-subscriber</a>)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>In a huge upset, a bill by Sen. Tom Apodaca, forcing district elections for Asheville City Council, is killed in the NC House. Objections came from some of the most conservative GOP House members. <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/S897b.mp3" target="_blank">Full audio here.</a></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Possible date for a decision from the NC Supreme Court in the Asheville water lawsuit: June 10th.</b></u><b> If no decision then, next likely date is in August. Check the Supreme Court opinion page <a href="https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/" target="_blank">here</a>.</b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 17th, 2016 Shocker</b></u>: In front of the NC Supreme Court, the attorney for the State actually invoked the state-of-Michigan-caused disaster in Flint, as part of his argument <i><b>for</b></i> the State takeover of Asheville's water system. Watch the <a href="http://wlos.com/news/local/preview-nc-supreme-court-tackles-the-asheville-water-system-debate" target="_blank">WLOS video</a> at timestamp 58:25.</span><br />
<br /></div>
<i><span style="font-size: x-large;">"When I think of service, I think of things like billing service, is my bill for water accurate, is it timely. I think about things like, is there adequate hydraulic pressure in the pipes - <b>irrespective of whether the water is clean</b>.</span><span style="font-size: x-large;">The water in Flint, Michigan may not be the cleanest in the world</span><span style="font-size: x-large;">, but it's a totally separate question to say that the hydraulic pressure was..." </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">(cut off by Justice's interruption): </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">"They're getting service and getting billed for it. Are you saying that doesn't relate to health and sanitation?" "<b>No, I don't believe that it does, </b></span><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Your Honor</span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>.</b>" </span></i><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">...and then goes on to argue that the NC Supreme Court should <i>"adopt a more relaxed view of the interpretation of the Constitutional phrase “relating to health and sanitation”.”</i> He's referring to the part of the NC Constitution contained in Article II Section 24, which prevents the legislature from enacting <b><i>local laws,</i></b> meaning those that apply only to one town or city, having to do with the provision of water or sewer services. The State has given up the pretense that the Water Act is a General Law, meaning one that applies statewide (but coincidentally <span style="font-size: large;"><i>(wink)</i></span> only <i><b>really</b></i> applies to Asheville). They've admitted that it is, in essence, a Local Law. So </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">in order for the seizure of Asheville's water system to proceed</span><span style="font-size: x-large;">, they need to persuade the Court to sweep aside the historical protections contained in Art. II Sec. 24. Despite the horrifying, contradictory example of Flint Michigan, they want the Court to embrace the assertion that forcibly transferring control of a municipal drinking water system from one government entity to another <i><b>has </b><b>nothing to do with health and sanitation</b></i>.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Along with allowing the State takeover of Asheville's water system, this radical change in interpreting the Constitution would allow <i><b>future</b></i> State seizures of municipal drinking water systems to occur in Local Bills, which are generally easier to pass and not subject to Governors veto. Is this the precedent that bill authors have wanted all along (as principal sponsor Rep. Tim Moffitt suggested in <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/involuntary.mp3" target="_blank">this</a> 2014 interview), and water activists have warned about?</span></div>
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGYbBGH_x0PGTlqdUea3KWxjTQ5-MzhU6xNRD0yXg1BvhW7qMk78lihgCgpgjtfkFSkfR9PfpPhJX-Bn8Bv-PDJy7Em9GK_wZi1JLxyZXcJOOuSQcFuTiHzri4fb1xfPD5We5acfZMyg/s1600/IMG_0128.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGYbBGH_x0PGTlqdUea3KWxjTQ5-MzhU6xNRD0yXg1BvhW7qMk78lihgCgpgjtfkFSkfR9PfpPhJX-Bn8Bv-PDJy7Em9GK_wZi1JLxyZXcJOOuSQcFuTiHzri4fb1xfPD5We5acfZMyg/s400/IMG_0128.JPG" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;">photo courtesy of Kasey Cotter of the <a href="http://historicburke.org/" target="_blank">Historic Burke Foundation</a></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Update:</b></u> Watch the video of the NC Supreme Court hearing, via WLOS <a href="http://wlos.com/news/local/preview-nc-supreme-court-tackles-the-asheville-water-system-debate" target="_blank">here</a>. A decision is expected within a few months.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Historic Burke County Courthouse</b></u> This is the courtroom where the oral arguments in <i>City of Asheville v. State of North Carolina et al</i>, will be heard. The case deciding the fate of Asheville's water system will be the first NC Supreme Court hearing held in this courtroom since the early days of the American Civil War. Read the documents, including Amicus Briefs filed in support of Asheville's case, <a href="https://www.ncappellatecourts.org/search-results.php?sDocketSearch=391PA15&exact=1" target="_blank">here</a>. Documents from the Court of Appeals case can be read <a href="https://www.ncappellatecourts.org/search-results.php?sDocketSearch=14-1255&exact=1" target="_blank">here</a>. Superior Court Judge Howard Manning's original ruling in favor of Asheville can be read <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/ruling.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEaZct9W-z3KTml1JxlQ6Sa1p4FrdgplLXYu2j7XYNEU0ecUiuzp0hglpUoKkfU0I4E7P8YGrJjV1EOqwQNThy3jLzI4Ud_vpUiUzVNFkIy76ANhI0BSn2zv9z_KMm_nPBn8Mg5S7pkQ/s1600/burke.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEaZct9W-z3KTml1JxlQ6Sa1p4FrdgplLXYu2j7XYNEU0ecUiuzp0hglpUoKkfU0I4E7P8YGrJjV1EOqwQNThy3jLzI4Ud_vpUiUzVNFkIy76ANhI0BSn2zv9z_KMm_nPBn8Mg5S7pkQ/s320/burke.jpg" width="318" /></a></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb. 29th.</b></u><b> </b>The North Carolina Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of City of Asheville v. State of North Carolina et al, on May 17th 2016. The hearing will not be held in the Supreme Court in Raleigh, it will be heard in the 'Historic Burke County Courthouse', in Morganton NC. <a href="https://appellate.nccourts.org/getCal.php?q=ZGF0ZT0yMDE2LTA1LTE3JmNvdXJ0PTE=" target="_blank">See the calendar here.</a><u><b> </b></u></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb. 8th, 2016</b></u> National Law Review publishes:</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b> </b></u><a href="http://www.natlawreview.com/article/north-carolina-state-government-control-local-water-systems" target="_blank">North Carolina State Government Control of Local Water Systems </a></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"After the events in Flint Michigan, the general public understands that: <i>People run water systems and people are the difference between good water and bad water.</i> The Transfer Law relates to health."<i> <span style="font-size: large;">John C Cooke</span></i> <b><br /></b></span></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0.19in; margin-top: 0.19in;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>March 28, 2013</b></u> <u>Crazy Coincidence Department</u>: On this day, <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/%28S%282klut40a1fg0xcpzn5q24ltp%29%29/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-Act-436-of-2012" target="_blank">the State of Michigan's new law</a> enabling 'emergency managers' to take over all aspects of municipal governments in the face of financial difficulties, took effect. The actions of Flint's 'emergency manager' appear to have led directly to the poisoning of thousands of city residents, as lead from aging pipes leached into their drinking water. <i><b>Also on this day</b></i>, Rep. Tim Moffitt <a href="http://ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=2473&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">filed the bill</a> to allow the State of North Carolina to seize control of the City of Asheville's water system.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The crux of the State of North Carolina's case justifying the takeover of Asheville's water is this: transferring control from one govt. entity to another does not "relate" to health and sanitation. If it did, the prohibition against certain "local" bills, contained in the NC Constitution, would prevent the transfer. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">So, does the unfolding disaster in Flint make it increasingly difficult to pretend that who controls water has no bearing on "health and sanitation". Good luck with that. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Jan. 29, 2016</b></u> The NC Supreme Court has announced they <i><b>will</b></i> take up Asheville's appeal, in the lawsuit attempting to stop the State seizure of their water system. <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/391PA15.pdf" target="_blank">Read the order here</a>. More info as we get it.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b> </b></u></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">At the same time as the Asheville announcement, the Court released it's decision on McCrory v. Berger. That case involves the dispute between Governor McCrory and the General Assembly, over their attempt to unilaterally take over appointments to important State Commissions. The Court ruled in McCrory's favor, stating that "the legislative branch has exerted too much control". Could this, and the fact that the Court chose to hear Asheville's case at all, indicate which way they may eventually rule?</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=1&pdf=33969" target="_blank">Read that decision here</a>. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Nov. 24th</b></u><b> </b>The City of Asheville files their Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review to the NC Supreme Court. The State has until Dec. 7th to respond. Read the petition <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/Notice%20of%20Appeal%20and%20Petition%20for%20Discretionary%20Review.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. Read the request for a stay of enforcement of the Court of Appeals decision <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Supersedeas.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">This
just got interesting: </span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Town of
Boone vs. State of North Carolina</b></u></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">In
October of 2014, the Town of Boone, NC <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/Boone%20complaint%20as%20filed%2010-10-14%20(1).pdf" target="_blank">filed a lawsuit</a> to block a
</span><span style="color: blue;"><u><a href="http://ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/Senate/PDF/S865v3.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">recently-passed
law</span></a></u></span><span style="font-size: large;"> that took away the town's
right to regulate their ETJ (extra-territorial
jurisdiction). </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0.19in; margin-top: 0.19in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The
Boone lawsuit was the first to be filed under a new law passed by the
General Assembly requiring the case be heard by a 3-judge panel
instead of a single Superior Court Judge, as the Asheville lawsuit
was.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0.19in; margin-top: 0.19in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">In
July 2015, Boone won their case. The 3-judge panel declared the
law “</span><b><span style="font-size: large;"><i>unconstitutional pursuant to the
prohibition on local acts contained in Article II, Section 24 of the
North Carolina Constitution"</i></span></b><span style="font-size: large;"> </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0.19in; margin-top: 0.17in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">This
ruling by the 3-judge panel was similar in one key point to <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/ruling.pdf" target="_blank">the City of Asheville's trial court victory</a> </span><span style="font-size: large;">in June of
2014 against the taking of their water system (from a single Superior
Court Judge): </span><i><span style="font-size: large;"><b>"The Water Act, a local
act, was enacted in violation of the provisions of Article II,
Section 24(1)(a) and Section 24(1)(3)"). </b></span></i><span style="font-size: large;"><br /><br />The State appealed both the Boone and Asheville decisions. Instead of
going to the Court of Appeals (as Asheville's case did), the new
process sent the Boone case straight to the NC Supreme Court. The
oral arguments in front of the Supreme Court took place on Oct. 6th
2015</span><span style="font-size: large;"> (</span><span style="color: blue;"><u><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12fTM7_qqX0&feature=youtu.be" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">video
of those arguments here</span></a></u></span><span style="font-size: large;">)</span><span style="font-size: large;">, the same day that the Court of Appeals issued the decision striking down Asheville's trial court victory.</span><span style="font-size: large;"></span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0.19in; margin-top: 0.17in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Despite
the fact that the Town of Boone filed their lawsuit months after the
Asheville lawsuit, they essentially leapfrogged over Asheville to the
NC Supreme Court. On Nov. 5th, the Supreme Court denied the State's attempts to throw out Boone's 3-judge panel victory, and indicated that they still intend to rule on the central point: </span><span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>the same issue at the heart of
Asheville's case - the Article II Section 24 prohibition against
local laws on certain topics that target only certain
municipalities.</b></i></span><span style="font-size: large;"><br /><br />No word on how or when
the Boone case will come back up at the NC Supreme Court, or when (or
whether) the City of Asheville's case will be heard. Also unknown,
are the implications of the fact that these two cases hinge on the
same legal principle, and that they are both landing on the Supreme
Courts doorstep at the same time.</span><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: 20pt;">And one of the disputes related to the State's attempt to restrict Boone's ETJ authority? Yes, you guessed it: <span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Control of water</b>.</span></span><span id="ms-rterangecursor-end"><br /></span>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Nov. 9th</b></u> Asheville <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/Petition%20for%20Rehearing%20and%20Attachments.pdf" target="_blank">petitions</a> the NC Court of Appeals to re-hear the case, asserting specific flaws in the Courts decision. The next day, the Court <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/14-1255_petition_denied.pdf" target="_blank">denies</a> the petition without explanation. Asheville then petitions the NC Supreme Court to hear an appeal.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Oct. 13th</b></u> Asheville City Council votes unanimously to appeal the decision to the NC Supreme Court.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Oct. 7th</b></u><b> </b>BlueRidgeNow, a Hendersonville-based website affiliated with the HendersonvilleTimes-News, <a href="http://www.blueridgenow.com/article/20151007/NEWS/151009888" target="_blank">repeats the claim</a> that the forced transfer of the Asheville water system will result in huge savings to ratepayers:<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;">"</span></span><span style="font-size: large;">When the law passed in 2013, legislators said the merger should save the average ratepayer $120 per year"</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The Asheville water system serves roughly 54,000 ratepayers. 54,000 times $120 equals $6,480,000. This claim is completely contradicted by the facts. In 2012, the Metropolitan Sewerage District commissioned the private firm Arcadis to perform a study on the economics of a transfer. Under parameters determined by MSD, <a href="http://msdbc.org/documents/waterstudy/final/FinalMergerStudy032013.pdf" target="_blank">the study</a> projected a modest $1.142 million average annual "savings" from the transfer. <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/MSD%20savings2..JPG" target="_blank">But that figure derives entirely (and then some)</a> from the elimination of what's known as "the Sullivan Act Transfers" - the 5% of water revenues that the City of Asheville was authorized by law to spend on street and sidewalk repair related to water system maintenance. However, the legislature removed that authority in 2013, in a <a href="http://ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h252&submitButton=Go" target="_blank">bill</a> co-sponsored by the same legislators that sponsored the Asheville Water Act. This was an act completely independent of a transfer of the water system. In fact, the City has continued to operate the system <i>without</i> the Sullivan Act Transfer authority in the 2 1/2 years since the bill was passed.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">An honest accounting of the projected cost/savings of a transfer of the water system from the City to MSD cannot include the 'Sullivan Act Transfers' line item. Once it is removed, MSD's own optimistically-framed study shows that not only will there be no savings, it will actually be less efficient than leaving control of the system with the City of Asheville.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When this was pointed out to MSD Board members in <a href="http://www.msdbc.org/documents/boardminutes/2013/072013.pdf" target="_blank">June of 2013</a>, Board Chairman Steve Aceto said, "What's good for the goose is good for the gander.", implying that the City of Asheville hadn't always been honest in their numbers relating to the water system, <i>therefor</i> <i>MSD was under no obligation to do so</i>.</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg89OUkdyvwSBDH0wRmz1wWnIFC1d7j4MaRS9TN_IOgsdzfcSOhDBwEz5la4yjlO7m976YXe_IYcLN02ATd8iPX9uidIwI9N5e2ak2AEnss40KwT8S1NwT3QQkZq4H6fQ_FsgtTQVTK2w/s1600/gander.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="84" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg89OUkdyvwSBDH0wRmz1wWnIFC1d7j4MaRS9TN_IOgsdzfcSOhDBwEz5la4yjlO7m976YXe_IYcLN02ATd8iPX9uidIwI9N5e2ak2AEnss40KwT8S1NwT3QQkZq4H6fQ_FsgtTQVTK2w/s640/gander.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">(Mr. Aceto resigned from the Board a few days after making this statement, ending his 20+ years involvement with MSD.)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">If MSD's own study showed there would be little or no "savings" resulting from a transfer, why did "legislators" (presumably Reps. McGrady, Moffitt and Ramsey), suggest that some $6.5 million in annual savings will be coming to water customers? And why is it <i><b>still</b></i> being touted as true in the local media?</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<u><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">City 1 State 1</span></b></u></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><u><b>Oct. 6, 2015:</b></u> The NC Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of the State of North Carolina in the case of the control of Asheville's water system. The City is expected to file for an immediate stay of implementation and appeal to the NC Supreme Court.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/14-1255-1.pdf" target="_blank">Read the decision here.</a> </span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiP_JnuZgOnwZg5yJ_fcoaAg0kQ510EFHYZvNohXzluTUgqQOwCSc4jTZb7t14Wxhu2m9GXq03XNQ2Uyg8ZiC1SIO2P_jGGvxaFaSWzOWR37GeZpd01bjHNXweNS8LnBLlWN5htoRoKMw/s1600/court.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="251" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiP_JnuZgOnwZg5yJ_fcoaAg0kQ510EFHYZvNohXzluTUgqQOwCSc4jTZb7t14Wxhu2m9GXq03XNQ2Uyg8ZiC1SIO2P_jGGvxaFaSWzOWR37GeZpd01bjHNXweNS8LnBLlWN5htoRoKMw/s320/court.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Watch the 65 min. video of the NC Court of Appeals hearing </b></u></span><b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://youtu.be/ZlTSBHw5d64" target="_blank">here</a></span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>.</b></u></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 3rd</b></u> Three Judge panel of the NC Court of Appeals hears the oral arguments on Asheville v. North Carolina (<a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/search-results.php?atty_first=&atty_last=&sDocketSearch=14-1255&short_title=&party=&start_date=mm%2Fdd%2Fyyyy&end_date=mm%2Fdd%2Fyyyy&type=&court_name=&bSearchTypeAnd=1&exact=0" target="_blank">read all documents here</a>). </span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">A decision is expected sometime within two months. <br /><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTQORDvwZFf6NTkDstTWgYk2EuYq2z0dERgXP97m8szHMMoG0PDUl6leaHSZ4W0Hte3PnC0U_3-1fPH88OqRmP-rq8v6HA_wFsqUsVirCBmSUNf5LmYnD-oBQLZ3TSFEdtMYsv7bgEqQ/s1600/Inside_Courtroom.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="158" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTQORDvwZFf6NTkDstTWgYk2EuYq2z0dERgXP97m8szHMMoG0PDUl6leaHSZ4W0Hte3PnC0U_3-1fPH88OqRmP-rq8v6HA_wFsqUsVirCBmSUNf5LmYnD-oBQLZ3TSFEdtMYsv7bgEqQ/s200/Inside_Courtroom.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">NC Court of Appeals</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</span><br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhy6gmP6ApMfRN0GbshWkzVvbkdLcQ2K69MLkQUBZhmVsOqJ1_1pPtTvk_L2vMsXV6lIH8lGPv4J1UIdNR98qEtJ2XEh6XERMnxMrtAFm8yiaRBSOBNXqO6DEUhA7_uLNFJk7HdiwurWw/s1600/IMG_20150603_105355.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="191" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhy6gmP6ApMfRN0GbshWkzVvbkdLcQ2K69MLkQUBZhmVsOqJ1_1pPtTvk_L2vMsXV6lIH8lGPv4J1UIdNR98qEtJ2XEh6XERMnxMrtAFm8yiaRBSOBNXqO6DEUhA7_uLNFJk7HdiwurWw/s200/IMG_20150603_105355.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Asheville's legal team</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 12th</b></u><b> </b>The NC Court of Appeals calendar is out, and oral arguments in the case of "The City of Asheville vs. the State of North Carolina et al" will happen at 9:30 am on Wednesday June 3rd, at the NC Court of Appeals Building in Raleigh.</span><br />
<br />
<u><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">May 11th</span></b></u><span style="font-size: x-large;"> The State of North Carolina's final filing in the water lawsuit appeal was filed - it contains some harsh language (<a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=170945" target="_blank">read it here</a>). The State is criticizing Asheville's "continued reliance upon incompetent, irrelevant and</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"> inadmissible evidence allegedly attesting to the intentions of individual members</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"> of the General Assembly concerning the Act as of the time the General Assembly</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"> enacted it." Ooooo, snap.</span><br />
<u><b><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span></b></u><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 7th</b></u><b> </b>The NC League of Municipalities has filed an Amicus Brief supporting the City of Asheville. Read it <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=170867" target="_blank">here</a>, and read all the other documents filed in the Court of Appeals <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/search-results.php?atty_first=&atty_last=&sDocketSearch=14-1255&short_title=&party=&start_date=mm%2Fdd%2Fyyyy&end_date=mm%2Fdd%2Fyyyy&type=&court_name=&bSearchTypeAnd=1&exact=0" target="_blank">here</a>.<u><b> </b></u></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>April 27th</b></u> The City of Asheville's Appellee's Brief in the Appeals Court round of their lawsuit has just been posted online. <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=170293" target="_blank">Read it here</a>. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /><b>And a surprise filing</b> - an 'Amicus Brief' from the City of Wilson NC, supporting the City of Asheville. Apparently, it's sinking in elsewhere that if they can do it to Asheville, they'll do it to you. That's essentially the reason given by the City of Wilson in the summary of their position. <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=170265" target="_blank">Read it here</a>. The full Amicus Brief <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=170267" target="_blank">can be read here</a>.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The State has two weeks to respond, after which the Court will decide whether to hear oral arguments, which is expected.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>March 6th</b></u> Attorneys for the City of Asheville have requested a <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=167983" target="_blank">30 day extension</a> to the deadline for the submission of their brief, and <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=167984" target="_blank">an expansion of the word limit</a>. Lots to say, apparently.<u><b> </b></u></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb. 27</b></u> The State of North Carolina has submitted their Appellant's Brief. <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=167391" target="_blank">Read it here</a>. Some sad news - Gary R. Govert, the Assistant Solicitor General preparing to argue the State's case before the Court of Appeals, has passed away. Special Deputy Attorney General I. Faison Hicks, who argued the case before the Superior Court, has taken it back over for the State.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Jan. 14 Lawsuit update</b></u></span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">Due to the State requesting a two-month delay in submitting their "Appellant's Brief" in the case, it's unlikely that a panel to hear their appeal of Judge Manning's Summary Judgement in favor of the City of Asheville will be selected until April. It's likely that a ruling won't happen until late summer or fall. After some negotiating, the official trial record has been agreed to. <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/show-file.php?document_id=163173" target="_blank">Read it here</a>.</span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">Check back here for updates, or <a href="http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/search-results.php?sDocketSearch=14-1255&exact=1" target="_blank">the NC Appellate Court site</a> for other documents.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Tryon NC update</b></u> 2- 3 years ago, around the time that the attempt to seize Asheville's water system began, it was <a href="http://www.tryondailybulletin.com/2012/01/19/tryon-considers-4-2m-offer-for-watersewer/" target="_blank">reported</a> that a somewhat mysterious company based in Texas was trying to purchase the water system operated by Tryon NC (pop. 1683). Tryon, 45 miles south of Asheville, sits at the intersection of a network of pipelines that connect many of the major sources of fresh water that serve WNC communities. When Tryon balked at the idea of selling their water system, <a href="http://www.tryondailybulletin.com/2012/02/16/ni-america-answers-bulletin-questions/" target="_blank">and started asking Ni America pointed questions</a>, the offer was withdrawn. It was never clear why anyone would want to purchase this small town water system, plagued by high maintenance costs and limited revenues. <a href="http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2014/12/15/you-wall-streets-human-shield/comment-page-1/#comment-121498" target="_blank">Could this be why</a>?</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Dec. 1st, 2014</b></u> At the annual City of Asheville legislative delegation breakfast, Rep. Chuck McGrady tells City Council that if the Water Act (H488) is ultimately struck down, he and Henderson County State Sen. Tom Apodaca intend to file legislation to "correct whatever the mistake might be". <a href="http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/chuckcouncil120114.mp3" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">(audio here)</span></a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">He did not go into specifics, but given that the Water Act had been struck down in Superior Court principally because it only applies to Asheville, it's not clear what could "correct" that, other than making the State seizure of municipal water systems apply to some <u><i>other</i></u> NC city or town, as well as Asheville.</span></span> </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Nov. 4th, 2014</b></u> NC House Rep. Tim Moffitt is defeated by Democratic challenger Brian Turner, and Rep. Nathan Ramsey is defeated by John Ager. The only sponsor of <a href="http://ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h488&submitButton=Go" target="_blank">H488</a> to keep his seat is Henderson County Rep. Chuck McGrady. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Aug. 29th</b></u> The transcript of the final May 23rd hearing in the lawsuit before Judge Howard Manning has been released.</span> <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/Transcript.Asheville2014.05.23.WakeCounty.pdf" target="_blank"><i><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Read it here.</span></b></i></a> <span style="font-size: x-large;">Sometimes humorous, very informative. A good read, if you want to understand the legal issues involved. And Judge Manning's June 9th ruling in favor of the City of Asheville is <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/ruling.pdf" target="_blank"><i><b>here</b></i></a>.</span><br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>July 8th</u></span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;"> The State has filed their "Notice of Appeal" in the Asheville water lawsuit ruling. <i><b><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/City%20of%20Asheville%20--%20AAA%20--%20State%27s%20Notice%20of%20Appeal.pdf" target="_blank">Read it here.</a></b></i></span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">Barring any extraordinary developments (see the "stay the relief" entries below), the conventional timeline for an appeal of this sort is 12 - 18 months. Check back for updates.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>July 2nd</u></span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;"> <b>Update </b>The "stay the relief" provision cited below, has appeared in <i><b>another bill</b></i>, <a href="http://ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=H189" target="_blank">HB189</a>. It still has the potential to be enacted before the end of the NCGA short session.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>July 1st</u> </span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;">The NC Attorney General's office has yet to file an appeal in the Asheville water lawsuit. They have until July 9th.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;">...which could become significant, if <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/stay.JPG" target="_blank">this provision</a> were to become law beforehand. Introduced </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">anonymously </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">to <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=8555&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">Senate Bill 744 <span style="font-size: small;">(page 218)</span></a> in the NC House Finance Committee, it <i>could</i> have the effect of "staying" the relief granted to the City of Asheville, ie: <b>the prevention of the State seizure of its water system</b>. "Staying" this relief would allow the State to implement the seizure and transfer of the water system to MSD <b><i>despite having lost in the original trial court</i></b>. The City of Asheville would then have to win on all appeals in order to (years after the consolidation was a <i>fait accompli</i>) attempt to claw the system <b>back</b> into municipal control.</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><i><span style="font-size: large;">“Injunction pending appeal of as-applied constitutional challenge. – Notwithstanding any other provision of law, where a trial court grants interlocutory, temporary, or permanent injunctive or declaratory relief restraining the State or a political subdivision of the State from enforcing the operation or execution of an act of the General Assembly as applied against a party in a civil action, the court shall stay the relief granted pending appeal. This subsection does not apply to facial challenges heard by a three-judge panel pursuant to G.S. 1-267.1.”</span></i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">The provision disappeared from later versions of the bill, perhaps because it is an absurd overreach of the Legislative Branch over the Judiciary. Even if it re-appeared, passed the NCGA and was signed into law by the Governor, it's unclear if any NC court would actually enforce it.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">But somebody floated it anyway. <u><i><b>Why?</b></i></u> </span></span><i><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></i></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>June 10th</u></span></b><span style="font-size: x-large;"> Wait a minute... what? In a <a href="http://www.wwnc.com/media/podcast-the-pete-kaliner-show-ThePeteKalinerShow/water-battles-not-over-in-asheville-24883803/" target="_blank">WWNC interview</a> the day after losing the lawsuit, Rep. Tim Moffitt states that if ultimately upheld, the law which attempts the forced regionalization of Asheville's water, could be applied "equally as involuntary" to <i>other</i> municipalities:</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;">“The way we constructed the bill was the appropriate way. We constructed the bill as we felt was necessary to get it enacted into law, in order to put together a framework that provides for the regionalization of water and sewer utilities, not only in our area, but in other areas throughout the state. So it’s a framework that’s in place, involuntary when it comes to Asheville’s standpoint, but certainly can be voluntary throughout the rest of the state, <i><b>or in certain situations, equally as involuntary.</b></i>“ </span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/involuntary.mp3" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">(audio clip here)</span></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">This will come as something of a shock to his fellow legislators, <a href="http://ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=4489&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">who took care to ensure</a> that they weren't setting a precedent that could come back to seize <i><b>their</b></i> water systems.</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<u><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>June 12th</b></span></u> <span style="font-size: x-large;">The State of North Carolina will appeal the ruling blocking the seizure of Asheville's water system, <a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2014/06/12/state-appeal-asheville-water-lawsuit-decision/10394671" target="_blank">a DoJ spokesperson confirmed</a>.</span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">There had been, and still is, the possibility that the NC General Assembly might choose to use new authority <a href="http://www.wncn.com/story/22951402/tillis-berger-agents-of-the-state" target="_blank">they granted themselves last year</a>, to intervene in the case. Currently, however, the appeal will be led by NC's Attorney General, Roy Cooper. No dates have yet been announced.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 10th</b></u><b> </b>The day he lost the lawsuit, <a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wlos_asheville-water-lawsuit-ruling-16544.shtml" target="_blank">Rep. Moffitt stated</a> that he is "somewhat amused" that NC Cities can sue the State Government at all.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 10th</b></u> <a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/story/elections/2014/06/10/moffitt-cra-repeal-water-system/10281237" target="_blank">Rep. Moffitt has announced</a> that he will abolish the newly-created Buncombe County Culture and Recreation Authority. <span style="font-size: large;">It was originally envisioned to benefit both City and County, but the City was excluded from it by Rep. Moffitt, after they filed the lawsuit over the taking of their water system. He was later <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/ohziq6481dqoize/2013-08-05%2012.16.07.mov" target="_blank">caught on tape</a> admitting that he had done it specifically in retribution of that act. Now, the day after losing that lawsuit, he and Rep. Nathan Ramsey have decided to permanently prevent the City and County from collaborating on shared recreation facilities and cultural activities.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Update: </b>Wasting no time, Reps. Moffitt and Ramsey introduced and got passed in the NC Senate Finance Committee, a repeal of the law creating the CRA. Problem is, <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/senatefinance2013/Meeting%20Documents/6-10-2014/H531%20ETJ%20Zoning%20Weaverville%20&%20Buncombe%20Summary.pdf" target="_blank">they told Senators preparing to vote on the repeal</a>, "The Authority has not been created." Buncombe County seems pretty sure they "created" the Authority last August: </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span dir="ltr"></span></span></span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><a href="http://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/depts/Administration/News_Detail.aspx?newsID=13885" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">"Culture and Recreation Authority Created"</span></a></b></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><br />
</b></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><br />
</b></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: small;">
</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 9th</b></u> <b>The City of Asheville has won the lawsuit against the forced taking of its water system. <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/ruling.pdf" target="_blank">Read Judge Manning's ruling here</a>.</b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The next decision rests with NC Attorney General Roy Cooper. Will he appeal the ruling? Reps. Moffitt, McGrady, and Ramsey have made statements suggesting they expect him to. <a href="http://www.blueridgenow.com/article/20140609/ARTICLES/140609894" target="_blank">Rep. McGrady has gone further</a>, suggesting that if Cooper decides not to appeal, the NCGA may intervene and fight the appeal without him. It's unclear if they </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">actually </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">have the authority to do so, <u><i>or</i></u> if the will exists in the General Assembly to further expend resources and political capital defending what is an unpopular new concept: The State owns all your public infrastructure, and can seize it and give it to whoever they want.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Cooper has thirty days to decide whether or not to appeal. </span><b><br /></b><br />
<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwA91GxzEA1nWhtKaenZDwSMGf_FmMDhxRg13cMqm_UmexUmcPIPNMejmLGHm1jxm-FiGFVya6YK3fanZn63PMo4JhYtNOr_ZAA1diJOLCxx22YXxWpT7p6B5lIJLsXvuwOMyywOYzjw/s1600/100_2737.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwA91GxzEA1nWhtKaenZDwSMGf_FmMDhxRg13cMqm_UmexUmcPIPNMejmLGHm1jxm-FiGFVya6YK3fanZn63PMo4JhYtNOr_ZAA1diJOLCxx22YXxWpT7p6B5lIJLsXvuwOMyywOYzjw/s1600/100_2737.JPG" width="259" /> </a></td><td style="text-align: center;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Attorneys for the City of Asheville </td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 23rd:</b></u><b> Final arguments were presented in the City of Asheville's lawsuit against the forced transfer of their water system. A ruling is expected anytime before June 23rd. </b>Some random thoughts <a href="http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2014/05/24/litigating-legislating-around-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-117872" target="_blank">here</a>, fuller description coming.</span> <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 15th, a week before the final hearing on the Asheville water lawsuit, this headline appears in the Triangle Business Journal:</b></u></span><br />
<br />
<h1>
<a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/2014/05/study-the-triangle-could-get-itsdrinking-water.html" target="_blank">Study: The Triangle could get its drinking water from Asheville</a></h1>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>The date for the final hearing on the Asheville water lawsuit: May 23rd. </b></u>We expect a ruling within 30 days after that. Whichever side loses is almost certain to appeal.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2014/04/07/you-invited-them/comment-page-1/#comment-115825" target="_blank"><u><b>A bit of historical context on the the roots of the Asheville/Buncombe water disputes</b></u></a>: Boom and bust real estate cycles going back to the 1920s.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Filed on Feb. 27th:</b></u> <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/City%20of%20Asheville%20--%20AAA%20--State%27s%20Sum%20Judgmt%20Mot%20and%20Brief.pdf" target="_blank">The State of North Carolina's Motion for Summary Judgement</a> in the lawsuit over control of Asheville's water system, makes a very peculiar assertion: that the 'Water Act' applies to Greenville NC, as well. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span lang="en-US">The cornerstone of the City's case is that the law is
unconstitutional, since it targets only one city's water system -
Asheville. Enter the shenanigans we dubbed "The Greenville Gambit".
Towards the end of the 2013 session of the NCGA, an amendment to the water seizure law started springing up in unrelated bills, presumably introduced by Rep. Tim Moffitt or his allies. Intended to remove one of the three criteria in the law that make it apply only to Ashevillle, it would have had the effect of making it apply to one other NC municipality: Greenville. The obvious intent of this was to undermine one aspect of Asheville's lawsuit.</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span lang="en-US"><br />
</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span lang="en-US">The City of Greenville and their reps in the House and Senate were not
pleased, and their opposition blocked the amendments. At the last
minute, though, they appeared to agree to a compromise. Senate Bill 341, the <a href="http://ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/Senate/PDF/S341v6.pdf" target="_blank">"Amend Interbasin Transfer Act"</a>
had had the original amendment inserted anonymously in the House
Environment Committee. But then Rep. Brian Brown of Greenville
introduced <a href="http://ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=6966&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">a second amendment</a>, when the bill reached the full House. The effect of the first was that it made the Asheville seizure law apply to
Greenville, but then under the new set of criteria introduced by Rep. Brown, made it <b><i>not</i></b>
apply to Greenville after all. We all scratched our heads, but given that the two
amendments together appeared to leave Greenville off the chopping block,
it passed easily and became law. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span lang="en-US">Now, seven months later, the next shoe drops:</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>The State Motion made on Feb.
27th acts as if that second amendment does not exist, and
that Greenville will soon be forced to surrender their water system to a
forced regionalization, same as Asheville!</i></b></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
<span style="font-size: large;">"If Greenville's and Pitt County's populations continue to grow at this
rate, it is reasonably foreseeable that Section 1(a) of the Act will
apply to the Greenville water system in the near future."</span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-size: large;">No
one who has read this Motion can yet make sense of how the State
intends to convince Judge Manning that the second Greenville
amendment does not mean what everyone else believes it means. And no
public reaction as of yet from Greenville or her representatives in the
NCGA, but they cannot be pleased. </span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span lang="en-US">A hearing before Judge Manning in Wake County is expected sometime in April, and a ruling at the Superior Court level is expected in May. Stay tuned... </span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span lang="en-US"></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span lang="en-US"></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span lang="en-US"><br /></span></span></span></span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>March 17th</b></u> Save the date! <i><b>"What Next For Asheville's Water?"</b></i> Mountain Voices Alliance, SaveOurWaterWNC, Clean Water for North Carolina, Asheville PARC and the WNC Alliance will co-sponsor an educational forum on the Asheville water issue, including an update on the status of the lawsuit and other issues affecting the future of water in our region.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;">Speakers will include Asheville Mayor Esther Manheimer, Clean Water for NC Asst. Director Katie Hicks, and Barry Summers of SaveOurWaterWNC.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">March 17th, 6 - 7:30 pm. at Lord Auditorium, Pack Library, downtown Asheville. <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/WaterForum-3-17-press-release-FINAL.doc" target="_blank">Download the press release here</a>.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Jan. 28th, 2014</b></u> Update on the lawsuit over the seizure of Asheville's Water System: The 120-day discovery period laid out in <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/stip%20case%20mgt%20order%20file%20stmpd.pdf" target="_blank">Judge Howard Manning's order of last October</a> has ended. The date of the next hearing on the lawsuit depends on whether any of the parties (City of Asheville, State of NC, Buncombe County MSD) file any motions related to the case. Each would require a delay to allow the other parties to respond. The window for when the next hearing in Raleigh on the lawsuit could occur is early March to mid-April. It's expected that a </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Summary Judgment </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">ruling at Judge Manning's Superior Court level would occur no later than mid-May. Whichever side prevails, appeals are likely. Further updates as they happen...</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Dec. 19th</b></u> <span style="font-family: inherit;"><span dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/177654/progressive-honor-roll-2013?page=0,1" target="_blank">The Nation magazine has recognized the "Mountain Moral Monday" event in August as the "Most Valuable Protest" in America during 2103</a>. Thanks go to
SaveOurWaterWNC members Elaine, Heather, Valerie, Beth, the NAACP, and
all the local and regional groups
that cooperated to put on this nationally</span>-recognized event of civic activism.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Nov. 13th:</b></u> Rep. Tim Moffitt is assigned co-Chair of a new committee, the <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=Non-Standing_6619" target="_blank">Public Enterprise System & Use of Funds Study Committee.</a> From his <a href="http://nchouse116.com/public-enterprise-press-release.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a>:</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The Public Enterprise System & Use of Funds Study Committee is
charged with looking at the allowable uses of government-owned
corporation funds and then making recommendations to the General Assembly to ensure transparency,
proper funding and the improved management of public enterprises run by
local governments. Public enterprises are business organizations owned
by the state (such as airports, transportation systems and sewer or
water systems) that are controlled by a public authority.<br />
<br />
"Essentially, we have a system today where the fox is guarding the
henhouse,” commented Rep. Moffitt. “Given the potential for the abuse
and misuse of such a system, it’s only prudent that we study this issue
and ensure best practices are in place to protect both the ratepayers
and the taxpayers." </span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><u>Two issues of concern</u>: The argument underlying the intent of this committee is pretty clear – all through the debate about the Asheville water system, we heard that the City is “stealing” revenue from the ratepayers every year, to support it’s general fund. The fact that the amount diverted from the ratepayer revenues goes to cover <i><b>the City’s</b></i> <b><i>cost of managing the water system</i></b> never seemed to penetrate the talking point, even when <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/msd_chuck113012.MP3" target="_blank">GOP Rep. Chuck McGrady tried to stop the spreading of that (in his words) "very bad information"</a>. Continuing that argument on a statewide level suggests that there may emerge legislation intended to prevent municipalities from recovering the full costs of operating enterprise fund activities like water, sewer, transportation systems, etc., placing further economic strain on local governments, and theoretically making the option of privatizing public infrastructure more attractive.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><u>The second, somewhat more worrying issue</u>: "</span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><i>Public enterprises are business organizations <b>owned
by the state</b></i>".</span> Are Rep. Moffitt and others in the GOP leadership preparing to assert that municipalities <i><b>do not even own</b></i> the public infrastructure they built and operate? This radical concept was introduced during the Asheville water debate. The argument goes, that since the system was funded almost exclusively through ratepayer revenue, the City could not claim to "own" it - it belongs to the "ratepayers". This concept has never been tested in court, but Rep. Moffitt appears to be asserting it as if it had, and that it applies statewide to <u><i><b>any</b></i></u> infrastructure operated by local governments as a "public enterprise."</span> </div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Nov. 13th:</b></u><b> </b><span style="font-size: large;">NC</span><b><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></b><span style="font-size: large;">Department of Environment and Natural Resources Deputy Director Mitch Gillespie <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/mitch.mp3" target="_blank">tells the Environmental Review Commission</a>, a joint NC House and Senate body, that there is a "possible basin" for natural gas shale deposits in Western North Carolina and that DENR is "going to go out there" and start exploring. This could represent major news on the fracking front - previously, all potential NC gas shale deposits were believed to be in the central/eastern part of the state. Water usage is a major component of the controversial nature of hydraulic fracturing, and the possibility of fracking coming to WNC puts the fight over Asheville's water system in a new light.</span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Oct. 9th</b></u><b><u>:</u> </b>As expected, the Judge in the Asheville water lawsuit has persuaded the parties to dispense with the preliminaries and go straight to Summary Judgement. The rulings on motions from the State and the City will be dismissed, and instead we will have a final hearing (on the Superior Court level at least), sometime in Feb. or March.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><br /></b><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/stip%20case%20mgt%20order%20file%20stmpd.pdf" target="_blank">Read Judge Howard Manning’s “Stipulated Case Management Order” here</a>.<u><b> </b></u></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Sept. 14th:</b></u> Using language similar to the justification of the seizure of Asheville's water system, <a href="http://www2.wataugademocrat.com/News/story/County-leaders-express-interest-in-regional-water-system-id-012540" target="_blank">Watauga County officials and State Rep. Jonathan Jordan confirm</a> they are considering the creation of a regional water system, which would require the Town of Boone to surrender control of their water to the County.</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> "There will
be opposition," Blust said. "But water is going to be like gold - whoever has the water has the
control and the power, and I just don't want that to get in the wrong hands. I'd rather that be in
the elected body of the county rather than just one town." </span></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Sept. 6th:</b></u> Preliminary injunction hearing on Asheville's lawsuit against the State seizure of their water system. Judge Manning has said he will take as many as 30 days to rule on permanently blocking the takeover as the case moves through the courts. The Temporary Restraining Order holds through Oct. 14th. </span><a href="http://www.880therevolution.com/media/podcast-the-jeff-messer-show-jeffmesser/jms-9613-hr1-23680762/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Listen to Barry's report from immediately after the hearing on Jeff Messer's 880 am radio show</span> (timestamp 3:45)</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/article/20130907/NEWS/309070023/Judge-hears-arguments-Asheville-water-case" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">AC-T story by Mark Barrett</span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/09/06/suit-challenging-asheville-water-system-grab-heard-in-superior-court/" target="_blank">NC Policy Watch/Progressive Pulse story by Rob Schofield</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSnZPGjf_HtHisVtTQxAXD8bhPzdm-C19auALe_xt5dtuioTaBK9LNa_YaMfd2OV4o2IZA6k2U6ZvKs9JJL8e-hMrD2pxxgGIsyoIaBTUILJgb57HUtx_r-o_qAhm1KvDagdnztrii4w/s1600/realtors.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSnZPGjf_HtHisVtTQxAXD8bhPzdm-C19auALe_xt5dtuioTaBK9LNa_YaMfd2OV4o2IZA6k2U6ZvKs9JJL8e-hMrD2pxxgGIsyoIaBTUILJgb57HUtx_r-o_qAhm1KvDagdnztrii4w/s200/realtors.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Aug. 11</b></u> <a href="http://mountainx.com/article/51854/Rep.-Moffitt-We-stopped-Asheville-from-joining-rec-authority-in-retaliation-for-water-lawsuit" target="_blank">Mountain XPress reports</a> on Rep. Moffitt's comments that leaving Asheville out of the County-wide Culture and Recreation Authority was explicitly in retaliation for fighting back on the water issue.</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-dlTFQl6vkBd5_4_Fp0lt7ccK8F4XSdRjyZX5T7l0Fktbf99ttRCg16ABff60UHHr4S57B7ERFsYYqt69tEhM19LyieSyTEdrcb5wj-Mg-m6KxN6AMcaa80SsMdf3hREiigJFKRni2Q/s1600/speech.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="101" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-dlTFQl6vkBd5_4_Fp0lt7ccK8F4XSdRjyZX5T7l0Fktbf99ttRCg16ABff60UHHr4S57B7ERFsYYqt69tEhM19LyieSyTEdrcb5wj-Mg-m6KxN6AMcaa80SsMdf3hREiigJFKRni2Q/s200/speech.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9q4iT1zCng" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Barry's remarks on the water issue at the Mountain Moral Monday event.</span></a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDosROkqsDSugMcHokArRjZ3KZiHitCd4hq-NSVD4f2zfuNAktuMyRGNaMqOUDdCt5aAcKIRx6noaC6EIz-QUvET81sp3U7e-wWuWT_BllLWI6qNPaZoCdv-h5p0sCoprq9RcCQKgzgQ/s1600/mmmphoto.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="112" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDosROkqsDSugMcHokArRjZ3KZiHitCd4hq-NSVD4f2zfuNAktuMyRGNaMqOUDdCt5aAcKIRx6noaC6EIz-QUvET81sp3U7e-wWuWT_BllLWI6qNPaZoCdv-h5p0sCoprq9RcCQKgzgQ/s200/mmmphoto.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Mountain Moral Monday</b> was a huge success. Estimates range between 5000 and 10,000 people - the largest political event in WNC in recent memory. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=7FNB3yJwS04" target="_blank">See the trailer for the upcoming documentary here</a>.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>August 5th</b></u> <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/ohziq6481dqoize/2013-08-05%2012.16.07.mov" target="_blank">Rep. Tim Moffitt tells the Asheville Board of Realtors</a> that he & the other legislators who crafted the Buncombe County Culture & Recreation Authority bill, kept the City of Asheville from joining the CRA <i>explicitly because they filed a lawsuit over the seizure of their water system.</i></span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">This confirms <a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/50508/Emails-reveal-state-reps-trying-to-settle-Asheville-water-lawsuit-may-change-city-elections" target="_blank">earlier reports</a> that this threat was levied against the City, but was denied at the time by these same legislators.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Update!!</b></u> For the second time, attorneys for the State of North Carolina have asked for & received a delay in the start of the lawsuit over Asheville's water. The new date is September 6th, 2013. The Temporary Restraining Order still prevents the seizure of the water system and watershed owned by the City of Asheville.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>August 5th</b></u><b> <a href="http://mountainmoralmonday.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Mountain Moral Monday</a>.</b></span> <span style="font-size: x-large;">Co-sponsored by SaveOurWaterWNC, western North Carolina joins the protests against radical legislation coming out of Raleigh, including the takeover of our water. NC NAACP President Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II will speak, along with a myriad of local and regional voices (including Barry of SaveOurWaterWNC). Aug. 5th, Pack Square in downtown Asheville, 5 - 6:30. Details <a href="http://mountainmoralmonday.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">here</a>.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>July 17th</b></u> <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/Senate/PDF/S341v4.pdf" target="_blank">Senate Bill 341</a> did indeed appear on the House calendar today, and was <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=6966&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">amended</a> by the delegation from Greenville. However, instead of removing the provision that threatened to draw them into the Asheville water dispute, they <i>added</i> a section to S.L. 2013-50 (the Asheville water seizure law):</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"> <span style="font-size: large;">"SECTION 1.(g) For purposes of this section, a public water system shall not include any system that is operated simultaneously with a sewer system by the same public body, in conjunction with the provision of other utility services for its customers."</span></span></div>
<div id="stcpDiv" style="left: -1988px; position: absolute; top: -1999px;">
“SECTION
1.(g) For purposes of this section, a public water system shall not
include any system that is operated simultaneously with a sewer system
by the same public body, in conjunction with the provision of other
utility services for its customers.” - See more at:
http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2013/07/15/they-finally-got-their-tax-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-100315</div>
<div id="stcpDiv" style="left: -1988px; position: absolute; top: -1999px;">
“SECTION
1.(g) For purposes of this section, a public water system shall not
include any system that is operated simultaneously with a sewer system
by the same public body, in conjunction with the provision of other
utility services for its customers.” - See more at:
http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2013/07/15/they-finally-got-their-tax-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-100315</div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Since Greenville does in fact operate a sewer system alongside it's water system, they are now excluded from the potential seizure of the water system. So, the provision that repealed a portion of the Asheville water seizure law, in an attempt to undermine the City's pending lawsuit, is still in the bill. But the new provision <i>still</i> excludes Greenville from future forced consolidation, so it's unclear why the amendment was put forward at all. The Asheville seizure law is unconstitutional, because it applies only to one city's water system. Making Greenville <i>also</i> appear to be vulnerable to forced consolidation, was the intent of the original S341 amendment. Simply changing the method whereby Greenville is excluded, makes no sense.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">S341 is on the Senate calendar for concurrence on July 19th. Stay tuned...</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>July 9th</b></u> Senate Bill 341, the "Amend Interbasin Transfer Law" bill, <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/s341detail.JPG" target="_blank">has the same amendment</a> that drags Greenville into the Asheville water dispute. It was voted through the House Environment Committee on June 20th, but has not yet been "reported out" to the full House. It can re-appear as a viable bill at any time. A scanned version of the bill, and the summary, <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/s341.pdf" target="_blank">can be seen here</a>.</span> <span style="font-size: large;">Additionally, Senate Bill 112, the companion bill to H94, has appeared on the agenda for Rep. Tim Moffitt's <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=House%20Standing_133" target="_blank">House Govt. Reform Committee</a>. It will come up 10 am Wednesday the 10th. Expect provisions ranging from fracking to the 'Greenville Amendment' to appear there as well. <span style="font-size: x-large;">Listen to the hearing at 10 am Wed. the 10th <a href="http://mobile.ncleg.net/New/Audio/StreamAudio.aspx?stream=appropriations" target="_blank">here.</a></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>July 8th</b></u> <a href="http://www.reflector.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-water-system-issue-comtinues-2100359" target="_blank">Greenville Daily Reflector editorial</a> on the resolution of their involuntary involvement in the Asheville water dispute: </span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"The overreach exhibited in this case cannot be allowed to stand, and
<i><b>this city should be a vocal proponent of Asheville as it continues this
fight.</b></i>" </span></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>July 3rd </b></u>Asheville Citizen-Times story on resolution of the Greenville issue. (<a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/article/20130703/NEWS/307030015/Asheville-water-gives-Greenville-headache" target="_blank">link here - subscription</a>) (<a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/asheville_greenville.doc" target="_blank">full text here.</a>)</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">“I think that it is evidence how strong that challenge
is to the constitutionality of the Asheville water bill,” said Vice Mayor Esther
Manheimer. “When the legislature tries to run over another community in its
effort to bolster its case ... that’s telling in itself.”</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span class="ecxaa"></span> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;">"Rep. Tim Moffitt, a Buncombe County Republican who is
the primary proponent of the Asheville water system transfer, would not say why
or by whom the language affecting Greenville was inserted into the environmental
amendments bill.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span class="ecxaa"></span><br />
<span class="ecxpp"></span>"Rep. Chuck McGrady, a Henderson County Republican who
backs the transfer, is a co-sponsor of the environmental amendments bill. He
could not be reached for comment Monday or Tuesday."</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;">... </span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;">"Manheimer and Barry Summers, an Asheville activist
opposing the transfer, both said the attempt to change the water transfer law
highlights a problem with the other side’s case.<span class="ecxaa"></span><br />
<span class="ecxpp"></span>“It’s very clear the only reason that this has been
inserted into this bill is that they know that the seizure of Asheville’s water
system is unconstitutional,” Summers said."<span class="ecxaa"></span> </span><span class="ecxaa"></span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>July 2nd</b></u> With the entire leadership of the town of Greenville looking down from the gallery, the Senate</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"> <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=6604&SeqNum=0" target="_blank">voted</a></span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=6604&SeqNum=0" target="_blank"> unanimously</a> to remove the line in House Bill 94 that would have dragged them into the Asheville water dispute. How will Reps. Moffitt, Ramsey, and McGrady make the seizure of Asheville's water <i><b>appear</b></i> to be constitutional now? Stay tuned.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 28th</b></u> Greenville NC discovers that due to a provision in H94, they too could be subject to a forced surrender of their water system. (<a href="http://www.reflector.com/news/city-control-water-system-issue-2093237" target="_blank">original article - subscription required</a>) (<a href="http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2013/06/27/the-cause-is-having-effect-dos-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-99219" target="_blank">full text</a>) (<a href="http://www.reflector.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-hands-greenville-water-system-2095395" target="_blank">editorial: Hands Off Water System</a>). </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 24th</b></u> Co-sponored by Rep. Chuck McGrady, <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/House/PDF/H94v3.pdf" target="_blank">H94, </a></span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/House/PDF/H94v3.pdf" target="_blank">"Amend Environmental Laws 2013"</a> amends more than just environmental laws:</span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"SECTION 34. Section 1(a)(2) of S.L. 2013-50 is repealed." </span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">S.L. 2013-50 is the 'Seize Asheville's Water' legislation, which is under legal challenge by the City of Asheville. The section that H94 intends to repeal is one of the key criteria that restrict the forced consolidation to only apply to Asheville. Repealing this section <i><b>after</b> it was put in place to gain the votes necessary for passage</i>, is solely intended to weaken the City's lawsuit.</span></div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b><span style="color: yellow;">Save the Date!!</span> June 24th</b></u> Save Our Water WNC goes to Raleigh, to join the NC NAACP Moral Monday protest in front of the NC General Assembly!! Tell our legislators Hands Off Our Water!!</span> <span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">$20 roundtrip to Raleigh is being arranged - <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/WATER-MORAL%20MONDAY%20FLYER-INVITE-FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">Download the flyer with all details here</a>. </span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="color: yellow;"><b><span style="color: #ffff33;"><b>ATTENTION</b></span>.</b></span></span> </span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "calibri"; font-size: x-large;"><span dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: "times" ,;">Both
our buses are now filled. There's a chance that some seats may open up
on the bus, but from this point on, we are no longer taking payments
for the round-trip to Raleigh. Come to the departure point at Innsbruck
Mall on Tunnel Rd. at 10 am. Monday to see if bus seats have become
available, or to arrange carpool/caravans.</span></span></span>
</span></span></span>Questions? Contact us at saveourwaterwnc@gmail.com</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 6th:</b></u><b> </b><a href="http://mountainx.com/article/50508/Emails-reveal-state-reps-trying-to-settle-Asheville-water-lawsuit-may-change-city-elections" target="_blank">E-mails released by the City of Asheville</a> show that NC Reps. Moffitt, McGrady, and Ramsey (sponsors of <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h488" target="_blank">H488</a>,
the bill seizing Asheville's water), have been secretly pressuring the
City to, in the words of the Vice-Mayor, "settle the lawsuit or else". </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">Threats reportedly include legislation delaying scheduled 2013 City Council and Mayoral elections for a full year. </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>June 4th: </b></u><a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/article/20130605/NEWS/306050025/Water-spending-flexibility-snuffed" target="_blank">The General Assembly passes H252</a>,
the "Asheville Tranfers" bill. This legislation repeals the City of
Asheville's ability to use water revenues to repair streets and
sidewalks related to water system maintenance. This takes that amount
off the <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/sullivans.JPG" target="_blank">ledger of costs/savings resulting from a merger of the water system with MSD.</a> The last veil is pulled aside: the merger will lead to higher costs and eventually higher rates for water.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 20th</b></u>: City of Asheville petitions NC Superior Court Judge How<span style="font-size: x-large;">ard Manning Jr. </span>for
a preliminary injunction to halt implementation of H488 during trial of
civil lawsuit. Read the City's suit against the State of North Carolina
and the Metropolitan Sewerage District <a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/108366839/Asheville%20-%20Complaint.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span> </span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>May 14th:</b></u> <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h488" target="_blank">H488, the "Regionalization of Public Ut</a><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h488" target="_blank">ilities"</a> becomes law without the Go<span style="font-size: x-large;">vernor's
signature. The City of Asheville has filed suit, and has been granted a
Temporary Restraining Order to block implementation of the forced
transfer of their water system.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><u>May 7th:</u></b> Asheville City Council <a href="http://www.ashevillenc.gov/NewsandEvents/CityNews/tabid/662/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/27230/City-Council-passes-resolution-authorizing-legal-action-if-watersewerage-merger-bill-should-become-law.aspx" target="_blank">passes resolution</a> authorizing legal action if water/sewerage merger bill should become law.</span> </span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><u>April 2<span style="font-size: x-large;">4th</span></u></b> 1 pm. Listen to the NC Senate Finance Committee discussion of <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h488" target="_blank">H488</a>, "The Regionalization of Public Utilities" <a href="http://mobile.ncleg.net/New/Audio/StreamAudio.aspx?stream=finance" target="_blank"><b>here</b></a>.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://mobile.ncleg.net/New/Audio/StreamAudio.aspx?stream=finance" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjY27Yt_6rTPsfQL_RIqePeN1jvI2bNIfXjDn9qNSOwAnn2T6RB8_kuJVrNHxeYKXUXnlaNAqQOPNL9_Auk1gtBC-SibQKkmflR_n7wOornV9heLXdjbJN1moGvdi1FH1bLkNZ4ohWbLg/s1600/Water_Icon_by_KumoSenpuu.png" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><br /></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>April 9th</b><b>, 8:30 am</b></u> NC House Finance Committee considers <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=h488" target="_blank">H488</a>, the "Regionalization of Public Utitlities Act"</span>.<a href="http://mobile.ncleg.net/New/Audio/StreamAudio.aspx?stream=finance" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><u>April 5th</u></b> At a breakf<span style="font-size: x-large;">ast for Asheville area business and political leaders, <span style="font-size: x-large;">Rep. Tim Moffitt tacitly a<span style="font-size: x-large;">cknowledges that studies have shown there will be no savings to ratepayers from a forced <span style="font-size: x-large;">transfer of Asheville's water system. </span></span></span></span></span><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/130405_002_2_2_1.MP3" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">(audio clip here)</span></a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">"Rep. Moffitt... The MSD <span style="font-size: large;">r</span>eport clearly suggests that a merger will actually cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $600,000 annually, and that's on top of the $2 million hit to the City of Asheville. Given that, can you still claim that a merger will actually save money?"</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: white;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span dir="ltr">"Thank you Barry. The answer to that is <i>yes</i>.
But I would tell you that neither you nor I have the gift of predicting
the future. So studies are exactly what they are, numbers are exactly
what they are, but consolidating these three public enterprises
is the right thing to do for our region..."</span></span></span></span></div>
</blockquote>
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The bill sponsors now have absolutely nothing to base their claims of "savings" to ratepayers on, and in fact<span style="font-size: x-large;">, all of the studies now show that there will be no savings, only red ink, f<span style="font-size: x-large;">rom a forced merger. And that's <i>before</i> any talk of compensation to the City for their <span style="font-size: x-large;">100s of millions of dollars worth of </span>seized assets.</span></span></span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Mar. 28th</b> <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/House/PDF/H488v0.pdf" target="_blank">In a bill <span style="font-size: x-large;">that does not mention</span> "Asheville" even once</a></u>, NC Reps. Moffitt, McGrady, and Ramsey initiate the unprecedented State theft of a municipal water system, and the City-owned watershed that feeds it. A<span style="font-size: x-large;">fter</span> seizing the assets <span style="font-size: x-large;">belonging to the City of Asheville, <span style="font-size: x-large;">t</span></span>he "Regionalizatio<span style="font-size: x-large;">n of Public Utilities<span style="font-size: x-large;">" bill sets up a new <span style="font-size: x-large;">c<span style="font-size: x-large;">ategory of State-<span style="font-size: x-large;">chartered agency that could be established in any County in North Carolina: one that muni<span style="font-size: x-large;">cipali<span style="font-size: x-large;">ties could then be forced to turn over their water or sewer assets to without compensation. Asheville is clearly the test case i<span style="font-size: x-large;">n a "watershed moment" for North Carolina<span style="font-size: x-large;">, one that will determine: do the people control thei<span style="font-size: x-large;">r local water and infrastructure, or does it belong to <u><i><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">T</span>he State</b></i></u>? Ladies and gentlemen, start your lawyers!</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><u> </u><br />
<br />
<a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24388865/20130325_HB%20252%20Finance%20Committee.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>City of Asheville releases analysis of the impact of losing the Sullivan Act T<span style="font-size: x-large;">ransfers.</span></u></span></a><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/House/PDF/H252v1.pdf" target="_blank">HB 252</a> would harm regional economic development efforts</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">HB 252 would limit investment in transportation infrastructure</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">Revenues have been used judiciously for regional investment</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">Water system continues to demonstrate strong financial performance</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">Asheville has not diverted revenue from the water system to subsidize its general fund.</span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Mar</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>.</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b> 26</b>: <a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/49179/MSD-impact-study-offers-snapshot-of-moving-merger-target" target="_blank">After criticism by <span style="font-size: x-large;">local activists <span style="font-size: x-large;">& at lea<span style="font-size: x-large;">st one Co<span style="font-size: x-large;">uncil member, XPress issues revised story that acknowledges $4 million annual cost to City taxpayers from forced merger.</span></span></span></span></a></span></span></u><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Still <span style="font-size: large;">no mention at all of likely compensation or watershed lease costs (<span style="font-size: large;"><i><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/47341/MSD-makes-57-million-offer-for-Asheville-water-system-despite-concerns" target="_blank">previousl</a></i><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/47341/MSD-makes-57-million-offer-for-Asheville-water-system-despite-concerns" target="_blank"><i>y</i> reported by XPress</a>), which would send merger costs significantly into the red for ratepayers.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><u> </u><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Mar. 21</b>:<span style="font-size: x-large;"> <a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/49090/Final-impact-report-on-Asheville-water-merger-presented-to-MSD" target="_blank">Asheville's Mountain XPress<span style="font-size: x-large;"> reports on the final <span style="font-size: x-large;">report of the MSD impac<span style="font-size: x-large;">t study<span style="font-size: x-large;">, repeats the fallacy that a forced merger will produce "</span></span></span></span></a></span></u></span><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/49090/Final-impact-report-on-Asheville-water-merger-presented-to-MSD" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">potential net savings to water customers of $1.1 to $2.2 million per year over the next nine years."</span></span></span></span></span></u></span></a><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;">The only way such "savings" will occur for water customers is if the City of Asheville <span style="font-size: large;">voluntarily relinquishes the water system <i>and</i> 22,000 acre watershed for not one thin dime of compensation<span style="font-size: x-large;">, <span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>and</i></b> if the City's budget can abs<span style="font-size: large;">orb a<span style="font-size: large;">n annual loss of $4 million revenue without serious tax increases<span style="font-size: large;"> for the 62% of water custo<span style="font-size: large;">mers who are <i>also</i> City residents.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><u> </u><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Mar. 6th</b>: <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=H252" target="_blank">Reps. Moffitt, McGrady, and Ram<span style="font-size: x-large;">sey introduce legislation rep<span style="font-size: x-large;">ealing the 'Sullivan Act Transfers'.</span></span></a></u></span> <span style="font-size: large;">The Sullivan Transfers allow the City of Asheville to use up to 5% of water revenues for street and sidewalk repairs related to water system maintenance. Losing the transfers will cost Asheville taxpayers approx. $1.5 million annually. Is this merely one more whack at the City, or is this a sign that Reps. Moffitt & Mc<span style="font-size: large;">G</span>rady have abandoned their intention to seize Asheville's water system? </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb 26th</b>. <span style="font-size: x-large;">Rep. Tim Moffitt co-spon<span style="font-size: x-large;">sors</span> <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=H159" target="_blank">legislation to create an "Infrastructure Oversight Commission"</a>.</span></u></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">If your goal was to set the State of North Carolina on a path to privatize public infrastructure, this is how you would do it. Background, ALEC connections, suppositions, etc. <a href="http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2013/02/26/open-carry/comment-page-1/#comment-86247" target="_blank">here</a>.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb 22nd</b>: <a href="http://www.news-record.com/opinion/773640-94/op-ed-municipal-water-systems-in" target="_blank">Greensboro News&Record Op-E</a><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.news-record.com/opinion/773640-94/op-ed-municipal-water-systems-in" target="_blank">d by Barry Summers</a>:</span></u><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span></span><span style="font-size: large;">The time is now for North Carolina towns and cities to adopt the League
of Municipalities resolution opposing such seizures, and for citizens to
contact their legislators to oppose this radical reshaping of our
shared resources.</span>
<br />
<br />
<u><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Feb 6th</b>: <span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/02/06/3835670/push-for-airport-authority-worries.html" target="_blank">Charlotte Airport may be stripped from the City's control by the General Assembly, placed under independent authority.</a> <span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Asheville losing it'</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>s airp</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>o</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>rt last summer in a bill co-sponsored by Rep. Tim Moffitt is cited a</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>s a clear precedent</b>.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></u><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> Still think the seizure of Asheville's <i>water system </i>will not lead to other seizures?...</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">The <span style="font-size: x-large;">House <span style="font-size: x-large;">bill stripping the Charlotte airport from the City of Charlotte is co-spons<span style="font-size: x-large;">ored by... <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=H104" target="_blank">a majority of the Asheville water Study<span style="font-size: x-large;"> Committee members including </span>Rep. Tim Moffitt.</a></span></span></span><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=H104" target="_blank"> </a></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><i> </i><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb. 5th</b>: Prominent </u></span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>Asheville </u></span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u>Republican and former Mayor Lou Bissette comes out against water merger<span style="font-size: x-large;">.</span></u><span style="font-size: x-large;"> WCQS David Hurand interview. Listen <span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://archives.wcqs.org/archives/stream/1776.m3u">here.</a> </span>(timestamp 22:00)</span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://scrutinyhooligans.us/2013/02/04/state-takeover-fight-moves-to-triangle/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Feb. 2nd</b>: SaveOurWaterWNC goes to NC Dem. Executive Committee meeting<span style="font-size: x-large;">, Durham.</span></u></span></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.blackmountainnews.com/article/20130130/BLACKMOUNTAINNEWS/301300013/Town-joins-chorus-against-merger?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage" target="_blank"><i><span style="font-size: x-large;">NEW!</span></i><u> </u><span style="font-size: x-large;">Representative Tim Moffitt confirms that he sees the </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">seizure of </span></a><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.blackmountainnews.com/article/20130130/BLACKMOUNTAINNEWS/301300013/Town-joins-chorus-against-merger?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage" target="_blank">Asheville's water system as a statewide precedent</a>:</span><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span><span style="font-size: large;">"Moffitt, also contacted after the meeting, said that municipalities shouldn’t be concerned about owning water systems.<span class="aa"></span><span class="pp"></span> That
is because as public utilities, systems should be thought of as
independent services for ratepayers. And any debt from building a system
would be carried by ratepayers, not city taxpayers, the South Buncombe
legislator said."</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: cyan;"><i><span style="font-size: x-large;">Breaking</span></i></span><span style="font-size: x-large;">: <a href="http://mountainx.com/article/48116/City-of-Asheville-anticipates-more-discolored-water-as-evaluation-continues" target="_blank">City of Asheville announces</a> temporary water discoloration due to scheduled inspection of water mains. Read the documents describing the process, <span style="font-size: x-large;">schedul</span>ing, and purpose of this inspection <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/sh/w3lj96rxft5p6ut/0510gWu0-N/Consolidation%20Study/General%20Info%20-%20CoA%20Water%20System/20120925_Main-Transmission-Line-Eval-PhaseII-Scope.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a> Read the </span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Aug<span style="font-size: x-large;">ust 14, 2012 </span></span></span><span style="font-size: x-large;">City Council minutes authorizing this work<span style="font-size: x-large;">, <span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/Approved%20Water%20Transmission%20Main%20120814.docx" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nclm.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/Legislative/2013-01-25%20FINAL%20ADVOCACY%20GOALS.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><u><b>Jan. 2</b><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>4th</b>: </span>North Carolina League of Munici<span style="font-size: x-large;">pali<span style="font-size: x-large;">ties <span style="font-size: x-large;">chooses their #<span style="font-size: x-large;">1 Advoca<span style="font-size: x-large;">cy Goal for 2013:</span></span></span></span></span></u></span></a> <i><span style="font-size: x-large;">"Oppose legislation that weakens or removes local control over public utility systems, specifically including municipal water and/or sewer systems."</span></i><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHAvLNGPX_DiR5oPXh1VhmkOU-kH0A09BEM2R185dN-gtJj8mwcvuqNXrLYEghAIIB-DkP007AUKMWRYwWcMBxJeQtlmj3AnsjQ7eJomGmoniQVdoMhEWZFvl_fM6s8OoU4Q5ooU02ww/s1600/resomap1.29.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="206" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHAvLNGPX_DiR5oPXh1VhmkOU-kH0A09BEM2R185dN-gtJj8mwcvuqNXrLYEghAIIB-DkP007AUKMWRYwWcMBxJeQtlmj3AnsjQ7eJomGmoniQVdoMhEWZFvl_fM6s8OoU4Q5ooU02ww/s320/resomap1.29.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">NC Cities/Towns that so far have placed the <a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/resolution.pdf" target="_blank">NC League of Municipalities </a><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/resolution.pdf" target="_blank">resolution Opposing the Forced Transfer of Municipal</a><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/resolution.pdf" target="_blank">-Owned Water Systems</a> </span>on the </span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">agenda and/or </span><span style="font-size: x-large;">passed
it:</span> </span></span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><i></i></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
1 Albemarle, City 15,903 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
2 <b>Asheville, City 83,393 </b>12/11/2012</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
3 Bald Head Island Village 162 01/18/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
4 Banner Elk, Town 1,046 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
5 Bessemer City, City 5,340 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
6 Black Mountain 7,848 01/25/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
7 Bladenboro, Town 1,627 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
8 Blowing Rock, Town 1,241 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
9 Boiling Spring Lakes, City 5,506 03/05/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
10 Burgaw, Town* 3,898 02/12/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
11 Butner, Town 6,344 01/03/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
12 Carrboro, Town 19,582 01/15/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
13 Carthage, Town 2,269 01/15/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
14 Chadbourn, Town 2,117 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
15<b> Chapel Hill 57,233</b> 02/27/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
16 Claremont, City 1,114 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
17 <b>Concord, City 79,066</b> 01/10/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
18 Conover, City 8,165 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
19 Elkin, Town 4,211 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
20 Foxfire Village 572 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
21 Franklin, Town 3,882 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
22 Goldsboro, City 36,437 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
23 <b>Greensboro, City 273,425</b> 04/03/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
24 Havelock, City 20,735 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
25 Haw River, Town 2,052 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
26 Henderson, City 15,386 01/28/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
27 Hendersonville, City 13,137 Tabled on 01/03/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
28 <b>High Point, City* 105,753</b> On 04/15/2013 Agenda</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
29 <b>Jacksonville, City 70,145</b> 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
30 Kannapolis, City 44,104 01/15/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
31 Kill Devil Hills, Town 6,683 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
32 King, City 6,599 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
33 Kure Beach, Town 2,200 01/15/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
34 Lexington, City 18,931 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
35 Maggie Valley 1,152 02/12/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
36 Maiden, Town 3,433 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
37 Matthews, Town 28,634 01/28/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
38 Montreat, Town 714 Tabled on 01/10/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
39 Mooresville, Town 32,711 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
40 Murphy, Town 1,632 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
41 Newton, City 12,968 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
42 North Wilkesboro, Town 4,176 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
43 Ocean Isle, Town 564 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
44 Oxford, City 9,426 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
45 Ramseur, Town 1,702 02/04/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
46 Reidsville, City 14,473 03/13/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
47 Rutherford College, Town 1,305 01/07/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
48 Seven Devils, Town 146 01/08/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
49 Smithfield, Town 10,966 01/03/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
50 Spindale, Town 3,865 01/21/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
51 Statesville, City 24,532 01/14/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
52 Tarboro, Town 10,383 01/14/2012</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
53 Topsail Beach, Town 374 02/13/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
54 Troutman, Town 2,392 01/10/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
55 <b>Winston Salem, City 299,617</b> 03/25/2013</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
*Pending City Clerk confirmation</div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Raleigh/Durham's <b>Indyweek</b> includes Asheville situation in rundown of emerging State Govt. trend: <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-environment-could-take-a-beating/Content?oid=3244841" target="_blank">"The Environment Could Take a Beating"</a>, <span style="font-size: large;">by Lisa Sorg.</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span> </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK7Ke1ZuzDndTRi0ASSFWDWSNRWk2WQAcWvEr58sXg-C1TBUE5rbzDHqDozQN_RrCrgHGt6gXk43UPqbRaN5wwZe1eFo1S_sz6hYJpf5gL-WbUUe6pRZAKjqbIrCrCkpyvYToWO6wdGw/s1600/msdcust.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="151" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhK7Ke1ZuzDndTRi0ASSFWDWSNRWk2WQAcWvEr58sXg-C1TBUE5rbzDHqDozQN_RrCrgHGt6gXk43UPqbRaN5wwZe1eFo1S_sz6hYJpf5gL-WbUUe6pRZAKjqbIrCrCkpyvYToWO6wdGw/s200/msdcust.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;">MSD breakdown shows that City of Asheville comprises 60% of MSD customers, pays <i>80% of the bills, </i>yet if Rep. McGrady follows through on plans to give Henderson County 3 sea<span style="font-size: x-large;">ts on MSD Board, Asheville representation will drop to 20%.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/msd_chuck113012.MP3" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Rumor Control: Rep. Chuck McGrady</span></a> <span style="font-size: large;">urges people to stop spreadi<span style="font-size: large;">ng "very bad information" ie, that <span style="font-size: large;">the "Cit<span style="font-size: large;">y of Asheville is robbing their water system, <span style="font-size: large;">even now, after Sullivan.</span>" After acknowledging that the City has presented verifia<span style="font-size: large;">ble water revenue <span style="font-size: large;">accounting </span></span>that disproves this, he says<span style="font-size: large;"> that "we need to get <i>some</i> group<span style="font-size: large;"> of people to stop talking about that." Is he talking about you?</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Barry interviewed by Ned Ryan Doyle for <a href="http://oursoutherncommunity.org/" target="_blank">Our Southern Community</a>. Download entire show <a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/OurSouthernCommunity010613.mp3" target="_blank">here</a>.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.news-record.com/opinion/437656-94/editorial-asheville-water-fight-bears" target="_blank"><u>Greensboro News & Record Editorial: Asheville Water Fight Bears Close Watching</u></a></span><br />
<div class="Text-Body_Type">
<span style="font-size: large;">"Asheville is fighting to keep its municipal water system and avoid a soaking. But the state legislature has the last word. Other cities should tune in to this drama playing out in the water-wealthy mountain community." </span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkcK9m9_eo-aAl3jG-GBlokVklzTWtYmjvKgEGwJzdEb3d0H1rsWyCOw6pOE4V5r4qRMhspSqUp59BWSOVVAaWuSuutwQ9uUiIOiIWB6ySll3wrxFjvkMi-NlFUgXszs5YlLHn90ZZTA/s1600/resolution.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkcK9m9_eo-aAl3jG-GBlokVklzTWtYmjvKgEGwJzdEb3d0H1rsWyCOw6pOE4V5r4qRMhspSqUp59BWSOVVAaWuSuutwQ9uUiIOiIWB6ySll3wrxFjvkMi-NlFUgXszs5YlLHn90ZZTA/s200/resolution.JPG" width="153" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/resolution.pdf" target="_blank">NC League of Municipalities: Sample resolution opposing the forced transfer of municipal-owned water systems.</a></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span> </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.880therevolution.com/player/?station=WPEK-AM&program_name=podcast&program_id=localEdgeRadio.xml&mid=22737860" target="_blank">Barry on Local Edge Radio 880 am, 12/27/12</a></span></span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">T</span>hanks are due to Local Edge host Blake Butler for years of service to the Asheville community</span> <span style="font-size: large;">- we wish him <span style="font-size: large;">luck i<span style="font-size: large;">n all his f<span style="font-size: large;">uture <span style="font-size: large;">endeavors<span style="font-size: large;">.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/47472/City-memo-if-Cane-Creek-merger-happens-CityMSD-may-end-up-subsidizing-Henderson-development" target="_blank">City of Asheville staff release memo</a> that suggests: "if Cane Creek merger happens, City/MSD will end up subsidizing Henderson development."</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;">
<img border="0" height="126" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTVaUtSr1R2PXYYsj4OMk-QOr0G7yLqB-9cuO1jv87oeLqyAen5qrOmQ5RGS4FEN35yQSj6lwncr69ANy3TAmDpigoIriVcyg6aepZndfRM4y25qRhiuQ5gwpHAkwGY2koh0OUmaHcDw/s200/mccrory.JPG" width="200" /></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioplLPBgyaZRdKOBldE2qC5fJVV2aHrSTtX1KXXM4YTvXCMS5RsRxxv0Nw_5QhJHdLZC8v3e_qpP5wMiYeFc_laUlbtvM88Ak5iUp09FzaHKVC7rEhu5ZABRoaguVdfjbXypoD5JSZBA/s1600/youtube.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="122" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioplLPBgyaZRdKOBldE2qC5fJVV2aHrSTtX1KXXM4YTvXCMS5RsRxxv0Nw_5QhJHdLZC8v3e_qpP5wMiYeFc_laUlbtvM88Ak5iUp09FzaHKVC7rEhu5ZABRoaguVdfjbXypoD5JSZBA/s200/youtube.JPG" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">video courtesy Jerry Rice</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"> <a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_water-protests-during-mccrory-visit-9845.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">NC Govern<span style="font-size: large;">or-elect Mc<span style="font-size: large;">Cr</span>ory promises to</span></span></a></span><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_water-protests-during-mccrory-visit-9845.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">come to Asheville immediat<span style="font-size: large;">ely after his</span></span></span></span></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_water-protests-during-mccrory-visit-9845.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">inauguration to "help<span style="font-size: large;"> resolve" the water </span></span></span></span></span></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_water-protests-during-mccrory-visit-9845.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: large;">issue.</span> </span> </span></a> </span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4_mNYPAmxu8#t=2954s" target="_blank">MSD Board acknowledges</a></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4_mNYPAmxu8#t=2954s" target="_blank">possible $26 million costs in</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4_mNYPAmxu8#t=2954s" target="_blank">upgrading/integrating Henderson</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4_mNYPAmxu8#t=2954s" target="_blank">County sewer with Buncombe</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4_mNYPAmxu8#t=2954s" target="_blank">County sewer. Costs will likely</a></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4_mNYPAmxu8#t=2954s" target="_blank">be paid by Buncombe ratepayers.</a></span> </span></span><br /><span style="font-size: x-large;"></span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFJnvQ1cmur3GyGCp0R6cfSx3Rb25RO-ErF-aHJXWfPWN5ayeEbXvmZQAF3nI6reiRY32MUDW40fq_Ad98rr4LGPZ3ddzxVdKt_7jUN1pdZZBoaVH3nJsln5YJUekh3hQsiat_oDhW9A/s1600/resolution.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFJnvQ1cmur3GyGCp0R6cfSx3Rb25RO-ErF-aHJXWfPWN5ayeEbXvmZQAF3nI6reiRY32MUDW40fq_Ad98rr4LGPZ3ddzxVdKt_7jUN1pdZZBoaVH3nJsln5YJUekh3hQsiat_oDhW9A/s200/resolution.JPG" width="181" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/20121212081551377.pdf" target="_blank">Asheville City Council unanimously</a></span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/20121212081551377.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">passes resolution opposing forced</span></a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/20121212081551377.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">transfer of water system. </span></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">City of Asheville releases t<span style="font-size: x-large;">wo studie<span style="font-size: x-large;">s:</span></span></span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> <a href="http://www.ashevillenc.gov/Portals/0/city-documents/cityclerk/mayor_and_citycouncil/current%20agenda/Worksession%20-%20Finanical%20Impact%20Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">Financial Impact AnalysisWater and Sewer Merger Study</a></span></span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.ashevillenc.gov/Portals/0/city-documents/cityclerk/mayor_and_citycouncil/current%20agenda/Worksession%20-%20Governance%20Model.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">UTILITY GOVERNANCE STUDY</span></span></a><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span></span> </span></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_water-protests-during-mccrory-visit-9845.shtml" target="_blank"><br /></a>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.wlos.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/wlos_water-protests-during-mccrory-visit-9845.shtml" target="_blank">WLOS coverage of the 'Defending Our Water' </a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Action, including reaction from Governor-elect Pat</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">McCrory.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.citizen-times.com/comments/article/20121209/NEWS/312090074/Study-Asheville-taxpayers-lose-water-sewer-merger" target="_blank">Asheville Citizen-Times coverage</a>, including</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"> reporting on City's financial analysis.</span><br />
<br />
<a href="http://mountainx.com/article/47236/Photos-Defend-our-Water-rally" target="_blank">Mountain XPress coverage</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.880therevolution.com/player/?station=WPEK-AM&program_name=podcast&program_id=localEdgeRadio.xml&mid=22680488" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Barry on Local Edge Radio 880am, 12/03/12 </span></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://www.wwnc.com/player/?station=WWNC-AM&program_name=podcast&program_id=PeteKaliner.xml&mid=22680649" target="_blank">Barry on Pete Kaline<span style="font-size: x-large;">r Show 570am, 12/03/12</span></a><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-size: small;"> (starts at 15:10)</span> </span> </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">‘<span style="font-family: "candara" , sans-serif;"><i><b>Defending
Our Water’ Action: Taking It to the GOP</b></i></span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: "candara" , sans-serif;"><i><b> </b></i></span></span>
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "candara" , sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><i><b>Saturday,
Dec. 8 starting at 4:30 pm</b></i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Last
month on Election Day, 86% of Asheville voters said 'No' to
the idea of selling or leasing the Asheville water system. In fact,
as AC-T op-ed writer John Miall commented after the election, "I
can't remember a time when 86% of Asheville voters agreed on
anything. Talk about a mandate." </span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">In
spite of these results, the NC legislature is sharpening knives in
anticipation of carving up the water system come January.
If allowed to happen, this would be an unprecedented state
government action that should send fear statewide into every
community. </span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">On
Saturday, December 8, the leaders of the North Carolina GOP,
including Governor-elect Pat McCrory, will be gathering at the
Grove Park Inn for the annual Charles Taylor Republican fundraiser. </span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Join
us beginning at 4:30 pm as we gather in protest on the corner of
Charlotte St. and Macon Ave. to raise the visibility of the
water issue before the very legislators who will be voting
on this matter. </span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><b>T</b></i></span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><b>his
is your chance </b></i></span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">to
be seen and heard – as well as provide a citizen face in opposition
to the taking of Asheville's water system by legislative fiat. We
will create a line of voters stretching up Macon Ave. with signs and
messages relating to the water issue. We expect to conclude once
the Republican fundraiser begins between 7-7:30 pm.</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">You
are welcome to create and bring your own signs or some pre-made ones
will be available. Please keep your messages strong, focused and on
the high ground without mentioning specific legislators names. Let’s
be the change we want to see. Some ideas include: </span></span>
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>86%
Say NO to Water Grab</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">
or </span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>Hands
OFF Buncombe Water</b></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">PLEASE
reach out to your personal networks and invite them to join the
rally by forwarding this message to your e-mail list, Facebook
friends, and neighbors. </span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>Families
with children are welcome and encouraged. </b></span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Numbers
count!</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>SUGGESTIONS:</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">
chairs are welcome; bring flashlights and signs; wear reflective or
light-colored clothing; water if needed.</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/rallyflyer.odt" target="_blank">print press release here.</a></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Previous posts moved to <a href="http://ashevillewater.blogspot.com/p/history.html" target="_blank">History page</a>.</span><br />
<ul>
</ul>
barryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18229976502728157264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5154911918700871392.post-4861736848608816832011-12-28T08:39:00.000-08:002012-09-25T18:33:08.760-07:00The Process<audio controls="controls">
<source src="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/track1.MP3">
If you cannot see the audio controls, your browser does not support the audio element
</source></audio>
<br />
<div style="color: black;">
<div style="color: white;">
<audio controls="controls"><source src="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/track1.MP3">If you cannot see the audio controls, <a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/108366839/track1.MP3">listen/download the audio file here</a></source></audio><br />
<br />
<br />
The first meeting of this committee is Jan. 23rd, in Raleigh. Public
comment will not be allowed. The City Council of Asheville and the MSD
have put together a Task Force to present the current state of the water
system to the 'water committee', at this first meeting. A total of four
hearings are allowed under the General Assembly's mandate - at least
one will happen in Asheville, with the first potentially in February.<br />
<br />
It could happen pretty quickly after that - they have until April, but they don't <i>have</i>
to take that long. Anytime after the fourth hearing, the committee
could put forward legislation for the full House to consider, and it
could become law by summer 2012.</div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=Non-Standing_6551">The 'water committee' led by Rep. Tim Moffitt: <b>Metropolitan Sewerage/Water System Committee</b>.</a></span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/2254/Rep.-Moffitt-proposes-legislation-seizing-Asheville-water-system-Updated-415-p.m.-Thursday">May 5th <b>XPress</b> article by David Forbes re: initial seizure bill</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/2666/Rep.-Moffitt-defends-Asheville-water-system-bill-says-critics-mistaken">May 27th <b>XPress</b> article by David Forbes re: change to 'study bill'</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.mountainx.com/article/37261/Toe-in-the-water">Nov. 8th <b>XPress</b> article by Nelda Holder: Toe in the Water </a> </span></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div style="color: white;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">These are the issues that the 'water/study committee' has been <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/lrc/House%20LRC%20Committees%20and%20Membership%20List.pdf">charged (pg.5)</a> to look at while deciding the future of Asheville's water system:</span></div>
<div style="color: black;">
<div>
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span>
</div>
<ol style="color: white;">
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Financial stability of the current
systems on a historic basis and the anticipated financial stability
of a combined system.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Cost-benefit analysis of a
combined system, including a review of assets and liabilities;
personnel needs; equipment and infrastructure replacement schedules;
facilities leased and owned; and fee schedules.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Debt obligation.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Taxpayer investment in the
systems.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Audit of current financials.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Comparative analysis of the
current system to existing public <span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>and private systems. </b></i></span><span style="font-size: x-small;">(emphasis mine)</span></div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Conservation and water efficiency
practices.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Best management practices.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The disposition of property in
Article 12 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes as it relates to
the conveyance of a water system.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The transfer of permits when a
water system is conveyed.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Any local acts applicable to the
city or metropolitan sewerage district.</div>
</li>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Other items the Commission deems
relevant to the study.</div>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><br /></b></span>
<br />
<div style="color: black;">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><i style="color: white;">And then there's this: </i></b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/Committees/Committees.asp?sAction=ViewCommittee&sActionDetails=House%20Select_136">Rep. Moffitt's <i>other</i> Committee, the <b>Select Committee on Public-Private Partnerships</b>; the 'privatization committee'</a></span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/DocumentSites/Committees/HSCPPP/12.12.11%20-%20Mary%20Nash%20Rusher%20Presentation.pdf">Dec. 12th presentation to the committee on methods and modes of privatizing NC public infrastructure, including water utilities</a></span></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ncleg.net/DocumentSites/Committees/HSCPPP/Meeting%202%20-%201.10.12/1.10.12%20-%20Christopher%20Lloyd%20Presentation.pdf"><span style="font-size: small;">Jan. 10th presentation to the committee on potential PPP legislation, modeled on Texas law, that would create a statewide privatization authority tasked with encouraging, regulating and facilitating PPP deals on state and local govt.-owned assets, including water utilities</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> (read more <a href="http://ashevillewater.blogspot.com/p/privatization.html">here</a>.) </span> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/alec_likes_tillis#storylink=misearch"><b>Raleigh News & Observer</b> article re: NC Legislators who attended the American Legislative Exchange Council's annual conference in 2011</a></span><br />
<ul>
</ul>
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Commerce%2c_Insurance_and_Economic_Development_Task_Force"><b>SourceWatch</b> page on the activities of ALEC's Commerce, Insurance and Economic Development Task Force</a> </span><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
From the 2011 ALEC Annual Meeting Program: "A few of the issues that
the Task Force will be considering at Annual Meeting include:
public-private partnerships, a national infrastructure bank, long-term
asset management, and multiple award schedule contracts... the Task Force meeting will (also) host a panel on
effective privatization: <b>'Tapping the Private Sector to Save Money and
Improve Performance.'" </b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Model" Bills introduced at the meeting include:<br />
<ul>
<li>Member, Private Sector Chair of Transportation and Infrastructure
Subcommittee, proposed "Establishing a Public-Private Partnership (P3)
Authority Act" (adopted) at Commerce, Insurance & Economic
Development Task Force meeting and Transportation and Infrastructure
Subcommittee meeting at 2011 ALEC Annual Meeting, August 5, 2011</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="http://ashevillewater.blogspot.com/p/privatization.html"> Read more on the Privatization? page.</a><br />
<ul>
</ul>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.cwfnc.org/"><b>Clean Water for North Carolina</b> </a></span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.cwfnc.org/category/drinking-water/privatized-water-supplies/">Report on water privatization in NC: </a><a href="http://www.cwfnc.org/category/drinking-water/privatized-water-supplies/">Privatizing NC’s Water, Undermining Justice</a></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.cwfnc.org/what-we-do/current-campaigns/hydraulic-fracturing/">Fracking page </a> </span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zBU2tVcCStw/TwJLeZufWeI/AAAAAAAAAFM/-DfnhwIseog/s1600/gavel-in-water.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="245" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zBU2tVcCStw/TwJLeZufWeI/AAAAAAAAAFM/-DfnhwIseog/s400/gavel-in-water.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<ul>
</ul>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<ul>
</ul>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span><br />
<ul>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="color: cyan;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<br />barryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18229976502728157264noreply@blogger.com